Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reinemann, C.
Right arrow Articles by Wilke, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Introduction

It's the Debates, Stupid! How the Introduction of Televised Debates Changed the Portrayal of Chancellor Candidates in the German Press, 1949—2005

Carsten Reinemann

Institut für Publizistik, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Colonel-Kleinmann-Weg 2, D-55099 Mainz, www.ifp.uni-mainz.de/reinemann

Jürgen Wilke

Institute of Journalism and Mass Communication at the University of Mainz

Media election campaign coverage is said to have changed fundamentally in recent decades. Among the trends identified are personalization, negativism, more interpretive coverage, deauthentication, and horse-race coverage. Usually, U.S. studies are cited as empirical evidence for these developments. Recent studies of European campaigns have shown, however, that the picture seems to be different there in various respects.This article argues that one of the reasons for the differences might be the lack of some central campaign events in European elections. Taking Germany as an example, it investigates how the introduction of American-style televised debates in 2002 and 2005 changed media coverage of the major candidates. On the basis of a long-term content analysis between 1949 and 2005, several dramatic effects of this new campaign event are shown.

Key Words: televised debates • campaign coverage • Germany

References

  • Blumler, Jay G., and Michael Gurevitch. 2001. "`Americanization' Reconsidered: UK-US Campaign Communication Comparisons across Time" In Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy, ed. W. Lance Bennett and Robert Entman. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Blumler, Jay G., and Dennis Kavanagh. 1999. "The Third Age of Political Communication: Influences and Features." Political Communication 16 (3): 209—30.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • " Campaign 2004 Final. How TV News Covered the General Election Campaign" 2004. Media Monitor XVIII (6).
  • Coleman, Steven, ed. 2000. Televised Election Debates. International Perspectives. NewYork: Macmillian.
  • Donsbach, Wolfgang, and Olaf Jandura. 2005. "Chances and Effects of Authenticity: Candidates of the German Federal Election in TV News." Press/Politics 8 (1): 49—65.
  • Druckman, James. 2005. "Media Matter: How Newspapers and Television News Cover Campaigns and Influence Voters." Political Communication 22 (4): 463—81.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Esser, Frank, Carsten Reinemann, and David P. Fan. 2000. Spin Doctoring in British and German Election Campaigns: How the Press Is Being Confronted with a New Quality of Political PR." European Journal of Communication 15 (3): 209—39.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Hetterich,Volker. 2000. Von Adenauer zu Schröder—der Kampf um Stimmen. Eine Längsschnittanalyse der Wahlkampagnen von CDU und SPD bei den Bundestagswahlen 1949 bis 1998 [From Adenauer to Schröder. A Longitudinal Study of the CDU and SPD Campaigns in National Elections 1949—1998]. Opladen, Germany: Leske und Budrich.
  • Kepplinger, Hans Mathias. 2002. "Mediatization of Politics: Theory and Data." Journal of Communication 52 (4): 972—86.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Maurer, Marcus, and Carsten Reinemann. 2006. Medieninhalte. Eine Einführung [Media Content. An Introduction]. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS-Verlag.
  • Maurer, Marcus, Carsten Reinemann, Jürgen Maier, and Michaela Maier, eds. 2007. Schröder gegen Merkel.Wahrnehmung und Wirkung des TV-Duells 2005 im Ost-West-Vergleich [Schröder vs. Merkel. Perceptions and Effects of the 2005 TV Debate in East—West Comparison]. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS-Verlag.
  • Mazzoleni, Gianpietro, and Winfried Schulz. 1999. "`Mediatization' of Politics: A Challenge for Democracy? " Political Communication 16 (3): 247—61.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • McKinney, Michael S., and Diana B. Carlin. 2004. "Political Campaign Debates." In Handbook of Political Communication Research, ed. L. L. Kaid. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Papathanassopoulos, Stylianos. 2000. "Election Campaigning in the Television Age:The Case of Contemporary Greece." Political Communication 17 (1): 47—60.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Pfetsch, Barbara. 2001. "Political Communication Culture in the United States and Germany." Press/Politics 6 (1): 46—67.
  • Plasser, Fritz, and Gunda Plasser. 2002. Global Political Campaigning. A Worldwide Analysis of Campaign Professionals and Their Practices. Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Reinemann, Carsten. 2003. Medienmacher als Mediennutzer. Kommunikations- und Einflussstrukturen im politischen Journalismus der Gegenwart [Media Makers as Media Users. Structures of Communication and Influence in Contemporary Political Journalism]. Köln, Germany: Boehlau.
  • Reinemann, Carsten, and Marcus Maurer. 2005. "Unifying or Polarizing. Short-Term Effects and Post-Debate Consequences of Different Rhetorical Strategies in Televised Debates." Journal of Communication 55 (4): 775—94.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Reinemann, Carsten, and Jürgen Wilke. 2001. "Long-Term Trends of Campaign Coverage or Do the Candidates Matter? A Study of the German Press 1949—1998." European Journal of Communication 16 (3): 291—314.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Schmitt-Beck, Rürdiger. 2004. "The Impact of Mass Media and Personal Conversations on Voting." In Comparing Political Communication:Theories, Cases, and Challenges, ed. F. Esser and B. Pfetsch. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schneider, Michaela, Klaus Schönbach, and Holli Semetko. 1999. "Kanzlerkandidaten in den Fernsehnachrichten und in der Wählermeinung. Befunde zum Bundestagswahlkampf 1998 und Früheren Wahlkämpfen" [Chancellor Candidates in TV News and Voters' Opinions. Findings from 1998 and Earlier Campaigns]. Media Perspektiven: 262—69.
  • Schönbach, Klaus. 1996. "`Americanization' of German Election Campaigns: Any Impact on the Voters?" In Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and their Consequences, ed. D. L. Swanson and P. Mancini. Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Schönbach, Klaus, and Edmund Lauf. 2002. "The `Trap' Effect of Television and its Competitors." Communication Research 29 (4): 564—83.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Schulz, Winfried. 2004. "Reconstructing Mediatization as an Analytical Concept." European Journal of Communication 19: 87—101.[Abstract]
  • Schulz, Winfried, and Reimar Zeh. 2006. "Die Kampagne im Fernsehen—Agens und Indikator des Wandels Ein Vergleich der Kandidatendarstellung" [The Campaign on TV. Agent and Indicator of Change]. In Die Massenmedien im Wahlkampf. Die Bundestagswahl 2005, ed. Christina Holtz-Bacha. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS-Verlag.
  • Schulz, Winfried, Reimar Zeh, and Oliver Quiring. 2005. "Voters in a Changing Media Environment: A Data-Based Retrospective on Consequences of Media Change in Germany." European Journal of Communication 20 (1): 55—88.[Abstract]
  • Semetko, H.A., and K. Schönbach. 2003. "News and Elections. German Bundestag Campaigns in the Bild, 1990—2002." Press/Politics 8 (3): 54—69.

The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, Vol. 12, No. 4, 92-111 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1081180X07307185
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reinemann, C.
Right arrow Articles by Wilke, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?