This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Levin, D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Structure of News Coverage of a Peace Process

A Test of the Indexing and Zero-Sum Hypotheses

University of Texas at El Paso, dlevin{at}utep.edu

Newspaper coverage of a peace process is crucial to the success of a peace process. Given the critical role that newspapers play defining "others" in peace processes, it is surprising that little research has gone into the dynamics by which newspapers portray national "others." Two schools of thought can apply to Western media:the indexing hypothesis and the zero-sum hypothesis. The indexing hypothesis suggests that to achieve balanced and unbiased coverage, newspapers will cover/cite both sides of an issue in proportion to their relative political strength. The zero-sum hypothesis suggests that under conditions of national stress newspapers abandon the indexing rule and that coverage/citation of fellow nation members comes at the expense of coverage/citation of national "others." Logit and probit models of Israeli newspaper coverage of the Oslo peace process from September 1995 to October 1999 show that the zero-sum hypothesis is a more accurate model. Only under favorable conditions (e.g., a peace treaty ceremony and its political wave) does indexing operate.

Key Words: indexing • peace processes • media coverage • Israel

The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, Vol. 8, No. 4, 27-53 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1081180X03256574


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?