Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoynes, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Political Discourse and the "New PBS"

William Hoynes

Vassar College, wihoynes{at}vassar.edu

Having survived efforts by political conservatives to eliminate federal funding for public broadcasting, public television in the United States remade itself as a market-savvy media enterprise in the mid-1990s. This "new PBS" sought to develop new revenue streams and forge new financial partnerships at the same time that public broadcasting found renewed political support on Capitol Hill. In this climate, this study examines the sources and subjects on public television’s public affairs lineup, exploring how public television measures up to the lofty goal of contributing to public life by providing a diverse alternative to commercial broadcasting. Based on a two-week sample of the eighteen most widely distributed public affairs programs on public television, findings indicate that the vast majority of stories focused on either the economy or domestic politics, while coverage of international issues was comparatively small. More than three-quarters of on-camera sources were corporate representatives, government officials, or professionals (mostly journalists), with infrequent appearances by members of the general public and citizen activists. More generally, analysis of sources and qualitative case studies of the most prominent stories in the sample—the 1998 congressional hearings on impeachment and the intertwined coverage of antitrust policy, corporate mergers, and corporate layoffs—suggest that political and economic coverage on public television focuses largely on the views and activities of insiders and routinely emphasizes the strategic dimensions of the political world. The study concludes with a discussion of the similarities between public affairs programs on public and commercial television.

The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, Vol. 7, No. 4, 34-56 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/108118002236349


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?