Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krauss, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lambert, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Press and Reform in Japan

Ellis S. Krauss

Graduate School of International Relations and Pacific Studies, University of California, San Diego, ekrauss{at}ucsd.edu

Priscilla Lambert

Department of Political Science, University of California, San Diego, plambert{at}weber.ucsd.edu

What political role does the Japanese press play? How does it cover important political issues and events? The common answers in the literature offer two very different views: the press as a "watchdog" for the public and a force of opposition to the dominant ruling party or the Japanese press as a "lapdog," subserviently reporting whatever officials dictate. We examine the Asahi newspaper’s coverage of two critical issues in a decade of enormous political upheaval: political reform from 1992 to 1994 and administrative reform from 1995 to 1997.An analysis of the patterns of coverage for all the articles during these periods and an examination of agenda setting, bias, and objectivity in a random sample of articles reveals that neither of the extreme characterizations of the press fits. Rather, the press plays a combination of roles: It is frequently the passive transmitter of information for agenda-setting officials, but it occasionally exhibits a pro-reform bias and tries to set the agenda in specific and limited ways. The authors conclude with a discussion of why these patterns of coverage emerge and why these overdrawn and distorted images of the Japanese press still exist.

The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, Vol. 7, No. 1, 57-78 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/1081180X0200700105


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?